Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALLFOOTBALLMESSAGE BOARDCHATLINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Football Topic:  Paging BTC Topic:  Paging BTC Author Message OhioCatFan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 14,313 Status: Offline     Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 8:32:22 PM  Can you explain to the BA multitudes exactly whet happened on the call on that run back that ended up with OHIO keeping the ball after a fumble. The official muttered something about the foul occurring before the fumble, but said that the foul was against the Redchickens after first saying it was against OHIO, which on returns is almost always the case that the return team is at fault. The whole thing left me totally baffled. The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA "It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right." Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,941 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 8:40:11 PM  OhioCatFan wrote: Can you explain to the BA multitudes exactly whet happened on the call on that run back that ended up with OHIO keeping the ball after a fumble. The official muttered something about the foul occurring before the fumble, but said that the foul was against the Redchickens after first saying it was against OHIO, which on returns is almost always the case that the return team is at fault. The whole thing left me totally baffled. Simple, you have to get the ball with “clean hands”. Miami committed a foul during the PSK portion, which means possession is assumed once the kick untouched is pass the LOS. Their run back is then wiped out and penalty enforcement rules are enforced. Back to Top Andrew Ruck General User Member Since: 12/22/2004 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,957 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 9:03:57 PM  I get that but the penalty on Miami was never mentioned before the review. What was the penalty they committed? Andrew Ruck B.B.A. 2003 Back to Top SBH General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 4,039 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 9:08:50 PM  Illegal blindside block. It was very clear in the replay. Last Edited: 12/8/2024 9:09:10 PM by SBH Back to Top Andrew Ruck General User Member Since: 12/22/2004 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,957 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 9:23:49 PM  SBH wrote: Illegal blindside block. It was very clear in the replay. Why was the kicking team blocking? Andrew Ruck B.B.A. 2003 Back to Top cbarber357 General User Member Since: 9/9/2012 Location: Pickerington, OH Post Count: 884 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 9:28:10 PM  Andrew Ruck wrote: SBH wrote: Illegal blindside block. It was very clear in the replay. Why was the kicking team blocking? The fact that they were blocking illegally to the back so far from the actual play points to the answer being discipline issues/mental lapse. That whole series of events was confusing, but on the replay it was an obvious penalty on Miami. Back to Top mf279801 General User Member Since: 8/6/2010 Location: Newark, DE Post Count: 2,471 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/8/2024 10:04:14 PM  Andrew Ruck wrote: SBH wrote: Illegal blindside block. It was very clear in the replay. Why was the kicking team blocking? A question the (TV) broadcast crew asked too. On the broadcast, and in my living room, the assumption was that WE had committed a block in the back on top of the fumble. The broadcast crew actually assumed at first that the Ref had just named the wrong team at first, until they went to the replay and (as noted up-thread) observed a very clear blindside block. The Miami player's thinking really 0wasn't clear (could have been ill-discipline, could have just been a collision) Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,941 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 6:20:26 AM  Andrew Ruck wrote: SBH wrote: Illegal blindside block. It was very clear in the replay. Why was the kicking team blocking? Good question, but they did. Was looking to knock a gunner off and he did. Back to Top LuckySparrow General User Member Since: 10/15/2012 Location: Illinois Post Count: 1,748 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 7:15:25 AM  In person, it was quite confusing. First the foul was on Ohio and the officials seemingly missed the fumble at the end of the play. On the replay, it was clear that Fiami had an illegal blindside block. Ohio accepted the penalty and pushed Fiami back and made them re-do the punt. What a day at the Convo.....Wow! Back to Top OhioCatFan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 14,313 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 10:24:15 AM  LuckySparrow wrote: In person, it was quite confusing. First the foul was on Ohio and the officials seemingly missed the fumble at the end of the play. On the replay, it was clear that Fiami had an illegal blindside block. Ohio accepted the penalty and pushed Fiami back and made them re-do the punt. Yes, in person, we did not have access to the announcers trying to explain what happened. Thanks everybody, especially BTC, I think I now understand what happened and why. The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA "It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right." Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org Back to Top Ted Thompson Administrator Member Since: 11/11/2004 Location: MAC Play Post Count: 7,629 Status: Online     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 10:30:04 AM  I re-watched the game last night. The initial ruling on the field announcement was that the runner was down and the penalty was on return team 32. It was a clearly a fumble on the play. But then the penalty was changed to kicking team 43. Not sure how you go from 32 to 43. But the replay clearly shows it was the right call. Right before Miami went to re-punt they stopped for another review. That may have been to make sure they had ball marked correctly. Follow Ohio Football recruiting on the BobcatAttack.com football recruiting database. Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,941 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 1:17:50 PM  Ted Thompson wrote: I re-watched the game last night. The initial ruling on the field announcement was that the runner was down and the penalty was on return team 32. It was a clearly a fumble on the play. But then the penalty was changed to kicking team 43. Not sure how you go from 32 to 43. But the replay clearly shows it was the right call. Right before Miami went to re-punt they stopped for another review. That may have been to make sure they had ball marked correctly. The second stoppage was yes to make sure the enforcement was correct and to confirm to Martin because it was announced improperly on the field. The fumble can be easy to lose on a play like that, because you don’t have it all boxed in and you can get blocked out just to the nature of the play. That’s why we have replay, and there it worked. As for the foul announcement, having a post kick foul like that on the kicking team is very rare and probably caught them off guard. Again, fixable and was fixed. Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,333 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 2:50:22 PM  You're all forgetting that these were MAC refs. I'm surprised they didn't rule it a safety. We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,941 Status: Offline     RE: Paging BTC    Posted: 12/9/2024 4:21:09 PM  Pataskala wrote: You're all forgetting that these were MAC refs. I'm surprised they didn't rule it a safety. They are hiring everyday! Can pick you up a cool$3,000 a weekend, come try it out. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 14  of 14 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 333 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 328 Guests 5 Registered Users:   Terry Lee, L.C., shabamon, bobcatgrad, Ted Thompson There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties