Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALLFOOTBALLMESSAGE BOARDCHATLINKS site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Football Topic:  Revenue sharing and on field performance Topic:  Revenue sharing and on field performance Author Message Alan Swank General User Member Since: 12/11/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 7,195 Status: Offline     Revenue sharing and on field performance    Posted: 4/21/2025 1:18:56 PM  This could have gone on football or basketball but with the upcoming football season, that seemed like the logical place to put it. With the dawn of revenue sharing just around the corner, I'm wondering what effect directly paying players will have on fan expectations and comments. Hypothetically, let's say a player gets $10,000 and throws a couple interceptions or fumbles twice or misses a few tackles. Will the fact that they are getting paid fuel the ire of hypercritical fans and increase the vitriol we already see on social media posts? Will there be criticism that "we're not getting our money's worth" be heard far and wide? I don't have a crystal ball but I'm not real confident that this is going to be a good thing for college sports. Back to Top Jeff McKinney Moderator Member Since: 11/12/2004 Post Count: 6,149 Status: Offline     RE: Revenue sharing and on field performance    Posted: 4/21/2025 3:30:50 PM  Your concerns make sense. Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,357 Status: Offline     RE: Revenue sharing and on field performance    Posted: 4/21/2025 4:21:45 PM  Also, a player who's suspended a game or two for violating team rules should be docked 1/12 of the revenue sharing amount for each game missed. Alan's scenario raises an issue that has come up occasionally in pro ball. If the revenue sharing includes some sort of performance incentive (number of yards, tackles, etc.), might a coach of a cash-strapped team -- or if the player gets in the coach's doghouse -- hold a player out or pull him early in a game at the end of the season to avoid paying the incentive? We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame General User Member Since: 7/30/2010 Post Count: 3,987 Status: Offline     RE: Revenue sharing and on field performance    Posted: 4/21/2025 5:26:40 PM  Pataskala wrote: Also, a player who's suspended a game or two for violating team rules should be docked 1/12 of the revenue sharing amount for each game missed. Alan's scenario raises an issue that has come up occasionally in pro ball. If the revenue sharing includes some sort of performance incentive (number of yards, tackles, etc.), might a coach of a cash-strapped team -- or if the player gets in the coach's doghouse -- hold a player out or pull him early in a game at the end of the season to avoid paying the incentive? In the pros, the revenue share dictates the percentage of revenue that must go to players pay, but does not actually dictate the individual pay. That's done by contracts. Contracts often have clauses about injuries and performance. Similar set up with the NIL, I'm sure. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 4  of 4 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 364 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 361 Guests 3 Registered Users:   OUbobcat9092, FrankSwolich, RufusCat09 There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties