Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALLFOOTBALLMESSAGE BOARDCHATLINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Recruiting Topic:  2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer Topic:  2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer Author Message brucecuth General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Post Count: 1,821 Status: Offline     2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/9/2017 10:57:15 PM  per the player's twitter. Saw him vs. Akron St. V at the state tourney and was impressed. This is a big fella! Still needs work, but lots of potential. We join numerous MAC schools, Cleve St, Air Force and others in offering. Last Edited: 5/9/2017 11:00:16 PM by brucecuth Back to Top Buckeye to Bobcat General User Member Since: 9/10/2013 Post Count: 1,802 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/9/2017 11:02:40 PM  A little slow in the feet, saw him on the tourney trail up this way. 8 miles from my hometown. Kid can play I think at next level but footwork is going to need to grow. The good news is he wasn't the emphasis of offense this year due to how heavy they were on the perimeter. He should get more reps this season in Wauseon's sets. Back to Top GoCats105 General User Member Since: 1/31/2006 Location: Seattle, WA Post Count: 7,155 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/10/2017 8:21:21 AM  VC showing offers from Richmond, Air Force, Bucknell, Cleveland State and some MAC programs. http://www.verbalcommits.com/players/austin-rotroff Back to Top Jeff McKinney Moderator Member Since: 11/12/2004 Post Count: 6,121 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/10/2017 8:43:51 AM  I saw him play on TV in state tournament. Looked like a Div I prospect. More than held his own vs Akron SVSM. Back to Top shabamon General User Member Since: 11/17/2006 Location: Cincinnati Post Count: 6,487 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/10/2017 8:41:30 PM  http://www.hudl.com/profile/3530149/austin-rotroff I see a good low-post presence here. I'm most impressed with what he does without the ball, as he get's great position and seals off his man, sometimes ending in a drop step and dunk. Back to Top RSBobcat General User Member Since: 8/22/2010 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,419 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/10/2017 11:54:43 PM  shabamon wrote: http://www.hudl.com/profile/3530149/austin-rotroff I see a good low-post presence here. I'm most impressed with what he does without the ball, as he get's great position and seals off his man, sometimes ending in a drop step and dunk. Yep - But D? RS Bobcat Back to Top GoCats105 General User Member Since: 1/31/2006 Location: Seattle, WA Post Count: 7,155 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/16/2017 9:36:20 AM  Other recent offers include Furman, American, Canisius and James Madison. Back to Top Buckeye to Bobcat General User Member Since: 9/10/2013 Post Count: 1,802 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 5/16/2017 4:27:05 PM  Ya had seen a fewer smaller schools from the Southeast up our way on the tourney trail including Elon and Furman. Fwiw, Furman has come up our way to find kids and has one from my hometown there now so no surprise they're coming up this way to find kids. Back to Top GoCats105 General User Member Since: 1/31/2006 Location: Seattle, WA Post Count: 7,155 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 6/19/2017 8:50:05 AM  Akron has offered. Back to Top GoCats105 General User Member Since: 1/31/2006 Location: Seattle, WA Post Count: 7,155 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 7/12/2017 10:42:12 AM  Like his size and ability to finish with contact. Looks a little slow and needs some better footwork. Would like to see more from him in game action on D too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQQnbIelHNg Back to Top Buckeye to Bobcat General User Member Since: 9/10/2013 Post Count: 1,802 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 7/30/2017 11:37:04 PM  Heard from couple sources here in NW Ohio that he now has offers from Xavier and Purdue. Back to Top Ted Thompson Administrator Member Since: 11/11/2004 Location: MAC Play Post Count: 7,630 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/18/2017 9:29:32 PM  Verbal to Duquesne. Follow Ohio Football recruiting on the BobcatAttack.com football recruiting database. Back to Top shabamon General User Member Since: 11/17/2006 Location: Cincinnati Post Count: 6,487 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/19/2017 9:13:50 PM  Dambrot has somehow convinced two Ohio bigs that Duquesne is a worthy basketball program. Back to Top RSBobcat General User Member Since: 8/22/2010 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,419 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/20/2017 1:25:31 AM  A10 vs MAC Perfect example of what our recruiting disadvantage is. A10 a powerhouse? Answer is clearly No (couple premier teams - balance crap). MAC - is what? Maybe Jeremy Guy, or Schaus (or any AD in the MAC ) has an answer? RS Bobcat Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,348 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/20/2017 9:26:30 AM  shabamon wrote: Dambrot has somehow convinced two Ohio bigs that Duquesne is a worthy basketball program. He's accumulated quite the collection of young bigs. Now, I wonder about guards and wings. I'd expect them to be in the top half of the A10 in 2018-19 after the transfers become eligible. Back to Top brucecuth General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Post Count: 1,821 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/20/2017 5:34:16 PM  RSBobcat wrote: A10 vs MAC Perfect example of what our recruiting disadvantage is. A10 a powerhouse? Answer is clearly No (couple premier teams - balance crap). MAC - is what? Maybe Jeremy Guy, or Schaus (or any AD in the MAC ) has an answer? Spot on, RSB and OUC. A-10 sent 3 teams to the NCAA tourney. When's the last time the MAC sent more than one? People will disagree and I respect that, but in basketball, there are no mid majors. Only "majors", defined as multiple bid leagues, and "minors" who only get an automatic qualifier. The MAC is a minor league. Last Edited: 9/20/2017 5:51:13 PM by brucecuth Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,348 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/21/2017 9:41:15 AM  brucecuth wrote: Spot on, RSB and OUC. A-10 sent 3 teams to the NCAA tourney. When's the last time the MAC sent more than one? People will disagree and I respect that, but in basketball, there are no mid majors. Only "majors", defined as multiple bid leagues, and "minors" who only get an automatic qualifier. The MAC is a minor league. I hate to totally hijack a recruiting thread, but.... In a way, don't you think it's that way kind of by design? As in the design of those who select the teams, broadcast the games, etc? Think about the last time a smaller conference magically got an at-large besides the WCC, who has seen the rise of Gonzaga, and St. Marys together, but otherwise isn't incredibly strong. The last small conference I can think of that got the second bid is the CAA in the form of George Mason. Sure, we can talk til we're blue in the face about how to schedule to get an at-large out of the MAC, but the facts are, the system is set up to exclude conferences like the MAC from getting an at-large. And while your point is factually accurate in the number of bids - the A10 is massively different than the MAC. That helps them in budget, scheduling and recruiting. The majority of the A10 doesn't have big dollar football, so hoops is their primary focus. They also have TV deals that help their funding that's solely for basketball. And lastly, the majority of the A10 are in major metro areas some of which are college hoops hot beds during the winter. Back to Top brucecuth General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Post Count: 1,821 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/21/2017 10:38:31 AM  OU_Country wrote: brucecuth wrote: Spot on, RSB and OUC. A-10 sent 3 teams to the NCAA tourney. When's the last time the MAC sent more than one? People will disagree and I respect that, but in basketball, there are no mid majors. Only "majors", defined as multiple bid leagues, and "minors" who only get an automatic qualifier. The MAC is a minor league. I hate to totally hijack a recruiting thread, but.... In a way, don't you think it's that way kind of by design? As in the design of those who select the teams, broadcast the games, etc? Think about the last time a smaller conference magically got an at-large besides the WCC, who has seen the rise of Gonzaga, and St. Marys together, but otherwise isn't incredibly strong. The last small conference I can think of that got the second bid is the CAA in the form of George Mason. Sure, we can talk til we're blue in the face about how to schedule to get an at-large out of the MAC, but the facts are, the system is set up to exclude conferences like the MAC from getting an at-large. And while your point is factually accurate in the number of bids - the A10 is massively different than the MAC. That helps them in budget, scheduling and recruiting. The majority of the A10 doesn't have big dollar football, so hoops is their primary focus. They also have TV deals that help their funding that's solely for basketball. And lastly, the majority of the A10 are in major metro areas some of which are college hoops hot beds during the winter. Really couldn't have said it better, OUC. Cause and effect. Same is true for most 1 bid leagues, I suspect. The only outlier is the Mountain West, which will be back to multiple bids before too long... Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,348 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/21/2017 11:05:37 AM  Good call on the MWC. I totally left them out, and I'd expect them to be a 2-3 bid league most years. Too many really solid programs out there. Back to Top RSBobcat General User Member Since: 8/22/2010 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,419 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/22/2017 1:17:26 AM  brucecuth wrote: OU_Country wrote: brucecuth wrote: Spot on, RSB and OUC. A-10 sent 3 teams to the NCAA tourney. When's the last time the MAC sent more than one? People will disagree and I respect that, but in basketball, there are no mid majors. Only "majors", defined as multiple bid leagues, and "minors" who only get an automatic qualifier. The MAC is a minor league. I hate to totally hijack a recruiting thread, but.... In a way, don't you think it's that way kind of by design? As in the design of those who select the teams, broadcast the games, etc? Think about the last time a smaller conference magically got an at-large besides the WCC, who has seen the rise of Gonzaga, and St. Marys together, but otherwise isn't incredibly strong. The last small conference I can think of that got the second bid is the CAA in the form of George Mason. Sure, we can talk til we're blue in the face about how to schedule to get an at-large out of the MAC, but the facts are, the system is set up to exclude conferences like the MAC from getting an at-large. And while your point is factually accurate in the number of bids - the A10 is massively different than the MAC. That helps them in budget, scheduling and recruiting. The majority of the A10 doesn't have big dollar football, so hoops is their primary focus. They also have TV deals that help their funding that's solely for basketball. And lastly, the majority of the A10 are in major metro areas some of which are college hoops hot beds during the winter. Really couldn't have said it better, OUC. Cause and effect. Same is true for most 1 bid leagues, I suspect. The only outlier is the Mountain West, which will be back to multiple bids before too long... So - the question remains - what are J Guy worthless dude, Schauss, and other MAC AD's doing about that? RS Bobcat Back to Top RSBobcat General User Member Since: 8/22/2010 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,419 Status: Offline     RE: 2018 6'9" C Austin Rotroff (Wauseon OH) Ohio offer    Posted: 9/22/2017 1:19:10 AM  RSBobcat wrote: brucecuth wrote: OU_Country wrote: brucecuth wrote: Spot on, RSB and OUC. A-10 sent 3 teams to the NCAA tourney. When's the last time the MAC sent more than one? People will disagree and I respect that, but in basketball, there are no mid majors. Only "majors", defined as multiple bid leagues, and "minors" who only get an automatic qualifier. The MAC is a minor league. I hate to totally hijack a recruiting thread, but.... In a way, don't you think it's that way kind of by design? As in the design of those who select the teams, broadcast the games, etc? Think about the last time a smaller conference magically got an at-large besides the WCC, who has seen the rise of Gonzaga, and St. Marys together, but otherwise isn't incredibly strong. The last small conference I can think of that got the second bid is the CAA in the form of George Mason. Sure, we can talk til we're blue in the face about how to schedule to get an at-large out of the MAC, but the facts are, the system is set up to exclude conferences like the MAC from getting an at-large. And while your point is factually accurate in the number of bids - the A10 is massively different than the MAC. That helps them in budget, scheduling and recruiting. The majority of the A10 doesn't have big dollar football, so hoops is their primary focus. They also have TV deals that help their funding that's solely for basketball. And lastly, the majority of the A10 are in major metro areas some of which are college hoops hot beds during the winter. Really couldn't have said it better, OUC. Cause and effect. Same is true for most 1 bid leagues, I suspect. The only outlier is the Mountain West, which will be back to multiple bids before too long... So - the question remains - what are J Guy worthless dude, Schauss, and other MAC AD's doing about that? More importantly - wtf are MAC AD's doing about the worthless J Guy dude? RS Bobcat Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 21  of 21 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Basketball Recruiting' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 256 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 255 Guests 1 Registered User:   OhioCatFan There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties